*

*
The official usmam.org > Softball
*
stealing in Adult slow-moving Pitch Softball
User Name
Remember Me?
Password

*

*
Fri Jun 10, 2005, 04:39pm
Gemini
*

On sphere 4 in adult slow-moving pitch stealing, is that a dead sphere like games with no stealing or deserve to runners take off. I believe it to it is in a dead round as proclaimed in the dominance book, however we have actually some officials speak it is a live ball.

You are watching: Can you steal in slow pitch softball


*

Originally posted by Gemini On ball 4 in adult slow pitch stealing, is that a dead round like gamings with no stealing or can runners take off. I think it to it is in a dead round as proclaimed in the rule book, yet we have some officials saying it is a live ball.

The ball continues to be live till the pitcher has actually possesion of the ball and also all play has apparently ceased. So correctly runners have the right to take off.
I think the original write-up is introduce to the ASA preeminence that allows stealing slowpitch, at the men"s levels and also the women"s open level. They deserve to steal as lengthy as play has not ceased and the pitcher walk not have actually the ball. I"m picturing the instance that ball 4 has actually been pitched, but the catcher enabled it to role away, which method it becomes live. That course, the still has to fulfill the criteria that it did not hit the plate or any kind of area in same territory.
Originally post by Ref Ump Welsch that course, it still has to meet the criteria the it did no hit the plate or any kind of area in fair territory.

I"m certain you intended if the round didn"t hit the batter, the bowl or the ground in former of the plate.Fair territory has actually nothing to perform with the rule
__________________The bat worry in softball is as much around liability, insurance and litigation together it is around competition, inflated egos and also softball.

Mike,I need to digress with you as fair are does matter, due to the fact that if it hits the ground on the sides of the key (that is in fair territory) the sphere becomes dead. Girlfriend can"t imagine how quick I had actually to contact dead sphere on those type of pitches.
Originally posted by Ref Ump Welsch Mike,I need to digress v you as fair territory does matter, due to the fact that if it access time the ground on the sides of the plate (that is in same territory) the ball becomes dead. Girlfriend can"t imagine how fast I had actually to contact dead round on those kinds of pitches.

I disagree. I don"t have my rule publication with me, therefore I"m going from memory. The runner can steal when the round crosses the front leaf of the plate as lengthy as it does not hit the batter or the plate. Due to the fact that the sphere hit the ground alongside the bowl it had actually to have crossed the prior edge and is live. Runners have the right to advance. Carry out you have a rule reference to assistance that the ball is dead once it hits alongside the plate?
__________________Gwinnett Umpires AssociationMulticounty soft ball AssociationMulticounty Basketball public official Association
Originally post by Ref Ump Welsch Mike,I need to digress through you together fair are does matter, because if it access time the floor on the sides of the plate (that is in same territory) the ball becomes dead. Girlfriend can"t imagine how fast I had to call dead sphere on those type of pitches.

Rwest is correct. The rule publication specifically says the front sheet of the plate, so that is very feasible that a pitch land in fair territory and also still remain live.
__________________The bat concern in softball is together much around liability, insurance and also litigation as it is around competition, inflated egos and softball.

Imagine this, a pitch the is a small "short" and also off come the next of the plate, that small area in "fair" territory. Carry out you always call the a strike, even if it never crossed the plate? same thing for permitting the steal. Mine UIC obtained on my case over that last year as soon as we allowed stealing in one of the men"s leagues here.
Originally post by Ref Ump Welsch Imagine this, a pitch that is a small "short" and off come the side of the plate, that small area in "fair" territory. Execute you constantly call the a strike, even if it never crossed the plate? very same thing for enabling the steal. My UIC acquired on my case over that last year once we allowed stealing in one of the men"s leagues here.

Whether the pitch would be referred to as a win is not appropriate to the rule. What carry out you average by "a tiny short"? execute you median that the round did no cross enough of the plate to be referred to as a strike? I recognize some umpires need that the round cross a certain part of the plate prior to calling the a stike. Is this what you room referring to? room you saying that if the pitch, in her estimation, did no cross enough of the plate to be referred to as a strike, climate the ball is not live? My understanding of the win zone is the if any component of the sphere crosses any part of the bowl in the strike zone the is a strike, nevertheless of wherein it lands. However that is beside the point when mentioning the steal rule. Again, it has no bearing, in mine opinion.
__________________Gwinnett Umpires AssociationMulticounty soft ball AssociationMulticounty Basketball officials Association
Originally post by Ref Ump Welsch Imagine this, a pitch that is a small "short" and off to the side of the plate, that tiny area in "fair" territory. Carry out you constantly call the a strike, even if it never ever crossed the plate?

No, no if the didn"t cross some part of the plate. No one has given any type of indication the it must be a strike or that they contact it a strike. Simply as legal/illegal pitch, ball/strike is irrelevant to the discussion.
exact same thing for enabling the steal. Mine UIC gained on my case over the last year once we allowed stealing in among the men"s leagues here.

Nothing I deserve to do about your UIC except suggest s/he evaluation 8.4.G.2 and also POE #50.I can tell friend that when the steal was an initial introduced in SP at the significant and at sight level, the back corners to be used, yet that hasn"t been for a couple of years now.
__________________The bat issue in soft ball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation together it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.

Originally posted by Ref Ump Welsch Imagine this, a pitch the is a little "short" and also off come the next of the plate, that little area in "fair" territory. Do you always call the a strike, even if it never crossed the plate?

No, no if that didn"t cross some component of the plate. No one has actually given any kind of indication that it must be a strike or the they speak to it a strike. Just as legal/illegal pitch, ball/strike is irrelevant to the discussion.
same thing for permitting the steal. Mine UIC got on my case over the last year when we allowed stealing in among the men"s leagues here.

Nothing I have the right to do about your UIC other than suggest s/he testimonial 8.4.G.2 and POE #50.

See more: How To Say 170 In Spanish - How Do You Say 170 In Spanish

I deserve to tell you that when the thefts was very first introduced in SP at the major and at sight level, the ago corners to be used, yet that hasn"t been for a few years now.
An illegal pitch is tho live because that the objective of stealing. The only time you can"t stealing is if the ball never ever crossed the front leaf of the bowl (i.e. Is short), hits the plate or the batter. If the ball never gets rid of 6 ft or is higher than 12 ft, the key is illegal but the runners can breakthrough once it crosses the front sheet of the bowl as lengthy as it doesn"t hit the plate or the batter.
__________________Gwinnett Umpires AssociationMulticounty soft ball AssociationMulticounty Basketball officials Association